Monday, November 25, 2013
THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX (AP English)
Thursday, November 21, 2013
ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE SONNET (AP English)
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
BRAIN WITH 6 LEGS
Friday, November 15, 2013
PLATO STUDY QUESTIONS (AP English)
the concept of reality and knowledge
2. What are the key elements in the imagery used in the allegory?
prisoners= humans
shadows=appearances (what we think is right/real)
the outside: new ideas/knowledge
prisoner that escapes= teacher
3. What are some things the allegory suggests about the process of enlightenment or education?
it's a struggle and that if you have completely different views on something, people might be react in a negative way to you.
4. What do the imagery of "shackles" and the "cave" suggest about the perspective of the cave dwellers or prisoners?
the cave suggests that people are cut of from knowledge and the shackles are what's keeping them restrained.
5. In society today or in your own life, what sorts of things shackle the mind?
laziness and the fear of the unknown
6. Compare the perspective of the freed prisoner with the cave prisoners?
the freed prisoner is enlightened and the cave prisoners are reluctant to go outside because they are used to being in there
7. According to the allegory, lack of clarity or intellectual confusion can occur in two distinct ways or contexts. What are they?
when they are enclosed and can't know the truth or when they don't want to know
8. According to the allegory, how do cave prisoners get free? What does this suggest about intellectual freedom?
by going outside and learning the truth. Intellectual freedom is as essential as physical freedom
9. The allegory presupposes that there is a distinction between appearances and reality. Do you agree? Why or why not?
yes because what you may perceive as real might be something else.
10. If Socrates is incorrect in his assumption that there is a distinction between reality and appearances, what are the two alternative metaphysical assumptions?
that people just assume is real if they can see it even though it might not be true.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
CONNECTING THE DOTS (Expository)
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Monday, November 11, 2013
RESEARCH PAPER (Expository)
Friday, November 8, 2013
HAMLET REMIX---in progress--(AP ENGLISH)
http://prezi.com/_tiz7wsjunhq/hamlet/
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
A POETIC INQUIRY (AP ENGLISH)
Why can't ALL humans cooperate with each other and make the Earth a better planet to live in? without any violence, corruption, or misery? How can languge help reach world peace?
I have not changed my question. But now I am a bit more focused on the linguistics concept of it because I would like to be a translator.
Finding a sonnet was difficult. Were we supposed to choose a sonnet by Shakespeare or Petrarchan? or it didn't matter who the author was?
The sonnet that I found doesn't have a big relationship with the language component of my question but it does talk about peace.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
7 TIMES (Expos)
2. facts? Even though both of them said the same thing, I feel that Erica's facts were affected by her personal feelings and that might have a stronger impact on the audience. (Pathos)
3. conclusions? Erica comes to the conclusion that shooting a teenager 7 times is 7 times too many while Javier sees a way to justify the police's actions.
4. writing techniques (figurative language, punctuation/capitalization, etc.)? Erica uses the word "I" throughout the essay while Javier keeps a distance. This shows the use of syntax(?) and punctuation. (?)
bullet 2. definitely dead
bullet 3. still dead
bullet 4. still dead
bullet 5. still dead
bullet 6. still dead
bullet 7. still dead
WHY 7?"
Monday, November 4, 2013
RACIAL PROFILING LIVES ON (EXPOS)
- "The ruling by Judge Scheindlin, of the Federal District Court in Manhattan, does nothing to disrupt the authority the Supreme Court has given police officers to target African-Americans and Latinos with little or no basis."
- legalized/institutional racism
- The hypothetical scenarios show the loopholes in the 4 amendment.
- If a female African-American/Latina were to be stopped and frisked, and they feel like they were sexually harrased, would they win if they went to court?
VOCABULARY 9 (EXPOS)
The ultimate showdown happened when the smartest students had a debate against each other.
interactive: (of two people or things) influencing or having an effect on each other; to come into contact
Two year-old are very interactive when they play among each other.
principle: a fundamental source or basis of something.
A principle in physics is that an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted by an outside force.
guidance: advice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty, esp. as given by someone in authority.
I go to the career center to get guidance in my college applications and scholarships.
collaboration: the action of working with someone to produce or create something.
The doctors were collaborating in a case that was difficult to diagnose.
formative: serving to form something, esp. having a profound and lasting influence on a person's development.
In a pregnancy, the first 6-8 weeks are formative.
summative: additive, cumulative
The grades for this semester are summative to my total GPA.
racism: poor treatment of or violence against people because of their race; the belief that some races of people are better than others.
Even though people would like to think racism doesn't exist, it still does.
intelligence: the ability to learn or understand things or to deal with new or difficult situations
I wish I had Issac Newton's intelligence.
PERFORMATIVE UTTERANCE + HAMLET---ESSAY (AP ENGLISH)
The importance of performative utterance on Hamlet is shown when he says his soliloquies. For example, when Hamlet gives his first soliloquy during act 1 scene 2, the audience knows how he feels about his mother marring his uncle. In act 1 scene 5, Hamlet learns that his father was poisoned and he uses illocutionary force to order himself to kill hi uncle to avenge his father's death. By Hamlet commanding himself to "remember and obey" his father's ghost, he is condemning his uncle to his death. When Hamlet says that he will remember his father, his speech constitutes actions because that means that he will kill Claudius.
Austin's idea is that languae describes and does. This idea can be backed up by Hamlet's actions. For example, when Hamlet gives his soliloquies, he is describing the way he feels and he is also describing how he is going to avenge his father's death. In other words, Hamlet uses his soliloquies to give himself a push in killing Claudious. By Hamlet "motivating" himself to kill his uncle, he shows that even though he doesn't know how to kill his uncle, he is sure that he needs to kill his uncle.
In my opinion, "self overhearing" means that someone says their feelings, what and how they feel out loud in order to help them self make decisions or to clarify their ideas and feelings. Another use of self overhearing is that it helps to memorize. When I was memorizing To Be Or Not To Be, I read the lines out loud and after a few repetitions, I had memorized that line.
In conclusion, Austin's idea of language can be seen through out the play by Hamlet's actions. In the play, self-overhearing has a big impact on the plot and the characters because by over hearing himself, Hamlet was able to decide what to do in order to take revenge against his uncle.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
vocab 9
- My cousin, who often spends her time painting, is an aficionado of art.
browbeat: (verb) to intimidate by overbearing words or looks; bully.
commensurate: (adjective) having the same measure; of equal extent, proportionate; having a common measure.
diaphanous: (adjective) very sheer and light; almost completely transparent.
emolument: (noun) profit, salary, or fees from office or employment.
foray: (noun) a quick, sudden attack; a quick raid.
genre: (noun) a class or category of art, music or literature.
homily: (noun) a religious sermon or speech that is intended to provide spiritual education, or any moral lessons that are being imparted, especially when being imparted or taught in a tedious way.
immure: (verb) to enclose within walls; to seclude or confine; to imprison.
insouciant: (adjective) free from concern, worry, or anxiety; carefree; nonchalant.
matrix: (noun) an environment in which something is created.
obsequies: (noun) funeral rite or ceremony.
panache: (noun) a grand or flamboyant manner; style; flair.
persona: (noun) a person; the characters in a play or novel; a person's personality.
philippic: (noun) a cruel attack of words.
prurient: (adjective) having or expressing lustful ideas or desires.
sacrosanct: (adjective) extremely sacred or inviolable.
systematic: (adjective) having, showing, or involving a system, method, or plan.
tendentious: (adjective) Marked by a strong implicit point of view; having or showing a definite tendency, bias, or purpose.
vicissitude: (noun) a change or variation.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
TOOLS THAT CHANGE THE WAY WE THINK (AP English & Expos)
'That's true,' said Brin. 'Ultimately I view Google as a way to augment your brain with the knowledge of the world. Right now you go into your computer and type a phrase, but you can imagine that it could be easier in the future, that you can have just devices you talk into, or you can have computers that pay attention to what's going on around them and suggest useful information.'
'Somebody introduces themselves to you, and your watch goes to your web page,' said Page. 'Or if you met this person two years ago, this is what they said to you... Eventually you'll have the implant, where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the answer."
-From In the Plex by Steven Levy (p.67)
How does use of the Internet, media, and/or technology change the way you think? Focus on your memory, your ability to concentrate, your sense of time and priorities, and the subjects/topics that interest you most. If you find "thinking about your thinking" difficult to assess, try the following strategies: compare yourself with older people who did most of their formal learning before smart phones and 2.0 existed; compare yourself with contemporaries who don't use those tools much today; read up on what education leaders and thinkers have to say about generational differences in thinking (and remember to cite your sources).
I think that the Internet has changed the way I think by enabling me to get information that I would probably never know. (even with filter bubbles) However, I think that in a way, it has made me less responsible and kind of unorganized. For example, if I have a homework assignment that I can use the Internet to help me with it, I would do that assignment last because I have Internet in my phone so I can do it during school. Also, I think that in a way I took a step forward and two steps back ever since I started to rely on the Internet so much.
FILTER BUBBLES (AP English & Expos)
-everyone sees something different when they search for the same thing and that the Internet doesn't really open doors for you, it just leads you to a place you will feel comfortable.
b)How does this information make you think differently about what you see online?
-there is more to what is being presented to me
c)What questions does this video raise about the Internet in general?
-how can I get all the different points of view that are out there?
d)How can you improve the effectiveness of your searches?
-by focusing on a different point of view
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
THOUGHTS ON HAMLET (IN PROGRESS) (AP English)
-Dr. Preston said that he interpreted as the ghost only presenting himself to people who are pure(?)...that kind of makes sense because Gertrude has little/no morals.
-I think that since Hamlet didn't care that he killed Polonious, he is not going to care who he has to kill in order to get revenge.
The Performative Utterance in William Shakespeare's Hamlet (AP English)
utterance: spoken word, statement or vocal sound; the action of saying or expressing something aloud.
Hamet's struggle is in doing what his brain is telling him to do. And not in whether or not he should kill himself.
Saturday, October 26, 2013
WHAT I THINK WHEN I THINK OF ACT ||| (AP English)
-I think it's kind of funny that nobody knows why Hamlet is so upset...gee, I wonder why, it's not like anybody he loved was murdered by his uncle (Claudius) and his mom (Gertrude) get married as soon as she could. Oh wait! that's what's going on.
-I understand why Rosencrantz and Guildenstern would want to tell Hamlet's uncle and mom about his emotional state but couldn't they just say "Your mom and uncle are worried about you. What's going on?"
-Why does Claudius want to spy on Hamlet and Ophelia? creepy. There's a thing called privacy.
-When Hamlet says, "and thus conscience makes cowards of us all", is he talking about the way Claudius reacted?
-Hamlet was an a**hole telling Ophelia to go to a convent so she could give birth to sinner.
-Polonius is kind of annoying because he is dumb
SCENE ||
- I'm impressed with Hamlet's intelligence in creating a play that shows whats going on in his life.
-If I were Claudius I would get the hint that Hamlet knows the truth.
-Does Horatio know about Claudius killing Hamlet Sn? How does he know? What does he think?
SCENE |||
-Claudius is right in being worried about Hamlet's actions.
-Claudius is an evil step dad, he just sends Hamlet to England...
-Does Claudius love Gertrude?
-Hamlet shows his trust for revenge when he is willing to wait to kill his uncle
SCENE IV
-Gertrude is a bad mother in agreeing with Polonius (I think)
-what is wrong with Gertrude that she didn't react to Hamlet killing Polonius?
-Did Gertrude helped Claudius Kill Hamlet sn? Does she suspect anything?
Thursday, October 24, 2013
LITERATURE ANALYSIS #3 (AP English)
The protagonist of this book is Antonio Marez. The setting is Guadalupe, New Mexico. His father, Gabriel Marez, a "vaquero" (cowboy), would like to see his son grow up and follow in the same path that he did, but Antonio's mother, Maria Luna (a devout catholic and daughter of farmers), would like Antonio to become a priest. When Ultima, comes to stay with the family, she teaches Antonio about the earth around him and the basics of her craft. After watching Tenorio shoot Ultima's owl, her spiritual guardian, Ultima herself begins to die. She asks Antonio to bury her owl, and he does so in honor of Ultima. In the end we see how Antonio looses his innocence and becomes a grown up.
2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.
A theme can be to be yourself and not let other people decide for you. (self-discovery?)
3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
The tone is one of comprehension.
"I had been afraid of the awful presence of the river, which was the soul of the river, but through her (Ultima) I learned that my spirit shared in the spirit of all things"
"I could not lie. I knew he would find the lie in my eyes if I did. But maybe there were other gods? Why had the power God failed to cure my uncle?"
"The sun was good. The men of the llano were men of the sun. The men of the farms along the river were men of the moon. But we were all children of the white sun."
"There are so many dreams to be fulfilled, but Ultima says a mans destiny must unfold itself like a flower, with only the sun and the earth and water making it blossom, and no one else meddling in it."
4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)
Symbolism: Golden carp, Ultimas owl, Virgen de Guadalupe, the last name "Luna"
Diction: Anaya uses phrases and sayings that have spanaish words on it.
Direct Characterization: the way that Ultima is described
Indirect Characterization: the actions that Ultima does and the way people react to her.
Metaphor: the way Anaya says that the Lunas are people of the land and the Marez come from the sun.
Synesthesia: They way Antonio described the way the soil felt.
Aphorism: The way that Antonio's brothers acted when they come back from the earth.
motif: loss of innocence
Literature Analysis #3 (Expository)
I feel like I know David and that I would like to follow up with his life at the present moment.
I think he uses both tools, fiction and nonfiction like interviews at the end of the book and direct & indirect characterisation.
He uses the descriptions of places to make an association of the way he felt. It's used to make a connection.
he uses diction and syntax.
I think he wants to create awareness of a problem through his memoir.
He uses dates and places I sort of know. I think this affects me because it makes it feel like is more realistic.
Something I think I will remember for a long time is all the suffering that David went through and now he is a well-known author.
In your book, what do the key people learn? How do they do it? How do you know?
David learns how to cope with his pain and he does it by withdrawing within himself. I know this because he says that he didn't have friends and since he couldn't talk to anyone, one can assume he withdrew within himself.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Vocab 8
cursory- not thorough or detailed
impetus- force with which a body moves.
pinnacle- a high pointed piece of rock.
contumely- insulting language or treatment.
bereavement- mourning
cache- a collection of items of the same type stored in a hidden or inaccessible place.
consummation- the point at which something is complete.
calamity- a disaster
avarice- extreme greed for wealth or material gain.
fortify- strengthen with defensive works so as to protect it against attack.
erratic- irregular in pattern or movement
ubiquitous- seeming to be everywhere.
fortitude- courage in pain or adversity
nonchalant- appearing casually calm and relaxed.
affect- make a difference to
effect- a change that is a result or consequence of an action of other cause.
misappropriate- unfairly take for one's own use.
pragmatic- dealing with things in a realistic way that is based on practical considerations.
metacognition- awareness and understanding of one's own thought process.
devoutly- showing deep religious feeling or commitment
Friday, October 18, 2013
10/16-10/18
**Since we are on the value of life unit, I think this video is related to this.**
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
VALUE OF LEARNING/VALUE OF LIFE
Thursday, October 10, 2013
GREEN EGGS AND HAMLET (AP English)
I know that the phrase "to be or not to be" comes from a soliloquy that Hamlet says. Also that he is struggling with his feelings after his father died and his mom married his uncle (his dad's brother).
b) What do you know about Shakespeare?
I Know that he is the author of Romeo and Juliet, he wrote tragic dramas, and that his works are hard to understand.
c) Why do so many students involuntarily frown when they hear the name "Shakespeare"?
Because Shakespeare has a bad reputation with students. When they hear his name, students connotate him with difficult to read plays that are boring. (is it just me?)
d) What can we do to make studying this play an amazing experience we'll never forget?
We can have disscusions to make sure we can understand the text and we can find the way to relate the play with our lifes.
LITERARY FICTION & EMPATHY (AP English)
*This part of the article made me think about what I learned in my child developmental psychology. I learned that the female brain has a better connection between the two lopes, making them better at recognizing emotions. I think that since the number of women tested is unknown, there is a possibility that the reason that people were better at identifying emotions is because they were women.
*Since the expository class I'm taking focuses on nonfiction...should the curriculum be changed?
*When I read fiction or nonfiction, I feel sympathy towards the character regardless of the genre of the book.
*In the article it says, "Maybe popular fiction is a way of dealing more with one’s own self, maybe, with one’s own wants, desires, needs.” Does this mean that people who enjoy popular nonfiction are selfish and/or egocentric?
Thursday, October 3, 2013
LITERATURE ANALYSIS 2 (AP ENGLISH)
This book is about a transgender guy named Liam who calls him(her)self Luna. The exposition of the story
is portrayed as a series of flashbacks. The narrator of the story is Luna/Liam's sister. This book gives the reader an insight on the struggle that Liam and Regan go through in order for one another to discover who they really are.
A theme of this novel is acceptance. This theme is present through out the whole novel because Luna wants to be accepted by society and specially his(her) father.
A. Lucid (easily understood: "Her eyes found me and she smiled. An aura framed her, a glow."
B. wry: "Pretty. A word for girls. The way handsome described boys. Liam was right; people did use boy and language. They expected different behaviors. When kids acted out of role,' as Liam put it, they were labeled tomboys or Sissies. "
1. analogy: The butterfly in the cover is a metaphor between Liam and the "transition" he wants to experience. "I want to be free. I want to transition."
2. Internal Conflict: "'no one will ever know the person I am inside. The true me. The girl, the women. All they see is this...this nothing.'....'Liam.' He let out a short laugh. 'Who's that? A caricature I've created. A puppet, a mime, a cartoon character. I'm this male macho version of a son that Dad has in his head.'"
3. External conflict: "Luna held her head high, waiting. Almost daring him to do it. seconds ticked away. Years. Then, slowly, Dad released his fist. My lungs collapsed. Luna reached for the door knob. 'Excuse me,' she said. Right in her ear, Dad said, 'If you walk out of that door, don't bother coming back.'"
4. Character vs self: "'Dad is my her. Doesn't he know that? I feel like I spend my whole life trying to prove it. "'
5. Foreshadowing: "'why did you dress at school?' I asked her. 'why did you have to do that?' She lowered her eyes. "You said it; I had to. I had to test myself. To see if I could go through with it. I needed to know that I had the self-confidence, the will to do it everyday."'
6. Flashback: "'Liam. Lia Marie. Please.' My eyes well with tears. Please." His left hand reaches out and snags the football helmet beside him. He holds it up to me by the faceguard. Inside is a mound of pills. Blue, purple,orange, white. 'I can't do it," Liam says. 'I can't even do it. I can't do anything right. I'm wrong. All wrong."'
7. Point Of view: The point of view is by the sister of the main character. "You're such a freakshow.". ..'I Know,' she murmured in my ear. 'but you still love me, don't you?'. .. yeah, I loved her. I couldn't help it. She was my brother." (pg.3)
8. resolution: "I took a step back, then another. I turned around. I walked, walked faster. Ran. Toward the door. The Exit. The entrance. 'Good-bye, Liam'"
9. Dialogue: The whole book has dialogue..
10. symbolism: The butterfly in the cover symbolizes Luna's desire to be herself.
1. "you are kind and generous, compassionate and caring." (Luna to Regan.)
2. "you are a strong and beutiful person."
INDIRECT:
1. " What would I do without you?" (Liam, Aly, and Elise to Regan.)
2. "I deliberately avoided taking classes taught by the teachers Liam had, since he was like their wunderkid.'
Yes. When the author speaks about Liam, the tone is usually nostalgic because Liam in apathetic to the things that happened around him. When the author speaks about Luna, she uses words that portray confidence.
If Regan is the protagonist, she would be a dynamic and round character. Through out the book Regan understands more the struggle that Liam goes through.
After reading the book, I Feel like I know Luna as if I were here friend. I think it's because I have a friend who is a transgender and thinking of the struggles Luna went through, I can imagine what he went through.
LITERATUE ANALYSIS 2 (Expository)
TOPIC(S) and/or EVENT(S)
1. As we have discussed in class, a book is said to be nonfiction if its content is based on facts or events. What is your book about? [a]. Try writing a paragraph first to capture your thoughts. [b]. Then see if you can boil it down to one clear statement. (Even if you feel like you can just skip to [b], please do both; remember that your reader doesn’t know what you know.
A. My thoughts on this book are that a mother should
ALWAYS love their kids. This book is about a a boy named David who is physically and psychologically abused by his mother.This is the second book, following"a child called it". In this book, the author talks about his struggles to find somewhere to call home.
B.
This book is mainly about a boy's journey through the foster care system.
2. Why did your author choose to write about this topic, person or event?
I think that the author wrote this book because he wanted to rell his story.
3. Why did you choose this book? What about the book appealed to you the first time it came to your attention (and how did it come to your attention)? What about the book made you want to keep reading once you began?
I choose this book because I read the first book and I wanted to read more about David's life.
4. Did you find the book realistic? Did you make any connections between people/events you read about and people/events in your own life? Why or (if you didn’t) why not?
I do find this book realistic because child abuse is something that happends everyday. I am thankful that I can not relate to this book.
PEOPLE
1. Since this book is nonfiction, the theory goes that the author didn’t create characters. But that’s not entirely true, is it? Doesn’t the author report his/her own interpretations based on personal observations? If we met his/her subjects for ourselves we might see them completely differently. What do the author’s choices say to you? Why did s/he choose to write about this book? What is the author’s tone, and what (if anything) does it say about the author and his/her subjects?
I think that I would feel the same way as I do about Davi's mother as I do now. The tone David uses is one of nostalgia.
2. Describe two or three people from the book. What do they look like? How do they act? How would you write them as fictional characters (would you use direct or indirect characterization?
If I were to write about Ms. Gold, Mother, and Father as fictional characters, I would use direct characterization.
3. What about these people makes them interesting enough to write about?
Ms. Gold is interesting to write about because she was the one who let David out of his personal hell. I would write about Mother because I would like to know what was going through her head when he was hurting David. I would write about Father because I would like to know how he stayed with mother while he saw all the bad things she did to him.
MORE ON CHARACTER/PEOPLE
1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization. Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)?
When David describes his mon when he was smaller, he calls her Mother and when he remembers the "old" times, he calls her mommy.
2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character? How? Example(s)?
When David describes his mon when he was smaller, he calls her Mother and when he remembers the "old" times, he calls her mommy.
The character is dynamic and round. He is dynamic because through the course of the book, he goes from 12 yrs to 18 years.
4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character? Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.
I feel like I know David and that I would like to follow up with his life at the present moment.
STYLE
1. Did the author use any tools from fiction writing (such as foreshadowing or symbolism), or did the author use a journalistic style? Example(s)?
I think he uses both tools, fiction and nonfiction like interviews at the end of the book and indirect characterisation.
2. Does the author use lengthy descriptions of places and people,or does s/he focus more on action or dialogue? What overall effect do these choices have on the book?
3. What tools does the author use to demonstrate tone and create a mood?
4. What do you think the author’s attitude was toward the subject, or the characters, or the audience (i.e., you)? Why?
5. What resources (newspaper articles, interviews, historical documents, e.g.) does the author offer? Did it matter in your thinking? Why/why not?
He uses dates and places I sort of know. I think this affects me because it makes it feel like is more realistic.
ENDURING MEMORY
Write a paragraph in which you describe the one or two ideas from this book that you expect to remember for a long time. Explain your choices and their importance. Share a passage or two that give your reader a taste of the same effect.
I think that once I have my house and my career, I am going to offer myself to foster kids in needs. I feel like it would be the human thing to do for the kids who are being abused.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
THE COMPARISON'S TALE (AP English)
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
TO BE OR NOT TO BE (Expository)
°I "translated" the soliloquy on a different piece of paper that I will be uploading later (tomorrow)
As I became familiar with the text, I realized that I understood the meaning in a different level. For example, I did not see the soliloquy as a way for Hamlet to tell everyone he wanted to kill himself until after Dr. Preston said it. The first time I read it I thought that Hamlet was undecided on nether or not to live his life the way he was. Later on, I found out that I wasn't totally wrong. For example, Hamlet had decided to kill his uncle but for some reason or another, he didn't.
The meaning I liked the most was the one that can be used as a way to go through metamorphosis in a physical and/or psychological way.
TALE OF A CANTERBURY TALE (AP English)
Perkin Reveler was an apprentice from the same town as the cook. Perkin Reveler was a short, dark man, who sold food and loved to dance. He enjoyed the tavern more than the shop. Every time there was a procession in Cheapside, he would leave the shop immediately to go dance, and not return back to the shop. Perkin Reveler was also a thief, who often stole from his master. One day Perkin Reveler's master decided to let him go due to the fact that Perkin Reveler was a bad apprentice. However, Perkin Reveler was happy to have been let go because he was now free and was able to do as he wished. Reveler then met a companion who he had a lot in common with. His companion loved to dice, kept a wife for show, and had a shop.
1. Explain the central character of the tale by analyzing five (5) examples of indirect characterization. (Maria Luna)
1. "At every wedding he would sing and hop" This characterizes Perkin as a person who is loud and that liked to have fun.
2. "He loved the tavern better than the shop" This is saying that Reveler was lazy and he would rather party thab do his job.
3. "there was no apprentice in the town who better rattled dice and threw them down than Perkin Reveler" This shows that he was a gambler.
4. "his master easily had learnt this in the shop, for that is where he often found his box completely bare." This characterizes him as a thief.
5. "Who loved dice. to revel and disport." This characteristicwas used to describe Perkin's ally but since the cook said they were the same, on can imply that Perkin was like this too.
2. What is Chaucer's purpose in telling this character's tale? Is he satirizing society, giving the voiceless a voice, or trying to accomplish a different goal? [Support your argument with textual evidence]
Chaucer's purpose in telling this tale is to ultimately show that people aren't always what they seem to be. I believe that Chaucer is trying to demonstrate the fact that one's character is based on their characteristics. The way one acts and presents themselves is who they really are as an individual. "He love to tavern better than the shop," indicates that Reveler did not enjoy working, but only liked to have fun.
I worked in the questions with MARISOL DUARTE
Saturday, September 28, 2013
TO ACT OR NOT TO ACT (Expository)
Friday, September 27, 2013
DEAR STEVE (Expository)
Thursday, September 26, 2013
CHARACTER STUDY (III) (AP English)
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
THE VALUE OF CHOICE (Expository)
CHARACTER STUDY (II) (AP English)
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
CANTERBURY TALES (I) (AP English)
*
CHARACTER STUDY (I) (AP English)
NETVIBES (AP English & Expos)
Monday, September 23, 2013
VOCAB #6 (AP English)
acerbity: sharp and forthright style of speaking
attrition: action or process of gradually reducing the strength or effectiveness of something through sustain attack or pressure.
bromide: a trite and unoriginal idea or remark, typically intended to placate
chauvinist: a person displaying excessive or prejudiced loyalty or support for a particular cause, group , or gender.
chronic: persisting for a long time or constantly recurring.
expound: present and explain an idea or theory in detail
factionalism: relating or belonging to a faction (a small organized group within a larger one)
immaculate: a person who is perfectly clean, neat, and tidy. Perfect.
imprecation: a spoken curse
ineluctable:unable to be resisted or avoided
mercurial: person who is subject to sudden or unpredictable changes of mood or mind.
palliate: allay or moderate; disguise the seriousness or gravity of an offense.
protocol: an official procedure or system of rules
resplendent: attractive and impressive though being richly colorful or sumptuous
stigmatize: described or t
Regard as worthy of disgrace or great disapproval
sub rosa: happening or done in secret
vainglory: inordinate pride in oneself or one's achievements; excessive vanity.
vestige: a trace of something that is disappearing or no longer exists
volition: the faculty or power of using one's will.
Obsequious: (adj) obedient; dutiful; fawning
2) Beatitude: (n) exalted happiness
3) Bete Noire: (n) a person or thing that one particularly dislikes or dreads
4) Bode: (v) to be an omen of
5) Dank: (adj) unpleasantly moist or humid; damp and, often, chilly
6) Ecumenical: (adj) general; universal: promoting Christian unity throughout the world
7) Fervid: (adj) heated in spirit, enthusiasm; intensely hot, burning
8) Fetid: (adj) having an offensive odor; stinking
9) Gargantuan: (adj) gigantic, enormous
10) Heyday: (n) the stage or period of greatest vigor, strength, success, etc.; prime
11) Incubus: (n) a nightmare
12) Infrastructure: (n) the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organisation
13) Inveigle:(v) to entice, lure, or ensnare by flattery or artful talk; to acquire by beguiling talk or methods
14) Kudos: (n) honor, glory, acclaim
15) Lagniappe: (n) tip, bonus, gratuity
16) Prolix: (adj) extended to great, unnecessary, or tedious length; long and wordy
17) Protege: (n) a person under the care of someone interested in his or her career or welfare.
18) Prototype: (n) the original or model on which something is based on for formed; someone who serves to illustrate the typical qualities of something.
19) Sycophant: (n) a self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite
20) Tautology: (n) needless repetition of an idea
21) Truckle: (v) to submit or yield obsequiously or tamely
VOCAB #6 (EXPOS)
brandish: wave or flourish something as a threat or in anger or excitement
comprise: an agreement or settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions
deft: neatly skillful and quickly in one's movements
destitute:without the basic necessities of life
explicit: stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt
extirpate: root out or destroy completely
inopportune: occurring at an inconvenient moment or inappropriate time
ironic: happening in the opposite way to what is expected and typically causing wry amusement because of this
musty: having a stale, or damp smell
officious: Assertive of authority in an annoyingly domineering way
ominous: giving the impression that something bad or unpleasant is going to happen
pinnacle: the most successful point; the culmination
premeditated: think out or plan beforehand
rampant: flourishing or spreading unchecked
solace: comfort or consolation in a time of distress or sadness
stately: having a dignified, unhurried, and grand manner
supple: bending and moving easily and gracefully; flexible
suppress: forcibly put an end to it
venal: showing or motivated by susceptibility to bribery
Adroit: expert or noble in use of hands or body
Amicable: characterized by goodwill.
Averse: strong feeling of opposition.
Belligerent: warlike.
Benevolent: kindly feelings
Cursory: rapidly over something
Duplicity: deceitfulness in speech or conduct
Extol: to praise highly
Feasible: capable of being done
Grimace: facial expressions
Holocaust: complete devastation or destruction
Impervious: not permitting penetration
Impetus: a moving force
Jeopardy: hazard or risk to exposure to loss
Meticulous: showing extreme care about minute details
Nostalgia: wistful desire to return in thought
Quintessence: pure concentrated essence
Retrogress: go backward to earlier/worse conditions
Scrutinize: examine in detail
Tepid: moderately warm
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
WHAT A CHARACTER (AP English)
A character that is memorable is Katniss Everdeen. She is memorable to me because she is brave and has a strong bond with her sister, like the one ,my sister and I shared when I was younger. Direct characterization, indirect characterization and dialogue contribute to the overall effect.
FREEDOM OF CHOICE ( Expository writtig)
Having someone make decisions for you might be sometimes be easier that making decisions for yourself. A pro of having someone else decide for you is that you don't have to stress over the outcome of the decision. For example, even if you think that the decision is bad, there is nothing you can so so might as well just relax. A con is that if someone else decides for you, they might not make the best decision for you. I personally like to make my choices. For example, if i make a bad decision, I know that it was MY mistake and i dont have the right to blame it on someone else. But if someone else decides for me and the decision is a bad one, I would get upset with the person even if they tried their best.
Monday, September 16, 2013
VOCAB #5 (Expository Composition)
Amicable: characterized by goodwill.
Averse: strong feeling of opposition.
Belligerent: warlike.
Benevolent: kindly feelings
Cursory: rapidly over something
Duplicity: deceitfulness in speech or conduct
Extol: to praise highly
Feasible: capable of being done
Grimace: facial expressions
Holocaust: complete devastation or destruction
Impervious: not permitting penetration
Impetus: a moving force
Jeopardy: hazard or risk to exposure to loss
Meticulous: showing extreme care about minute details
Nostalgia: wistful desire to return in thought
Quintessence: pure concentrated essence
Retrogress: go backward to earlier/worse conditions
Scrutinize: examine in detail
Tepid: moderately warm
VOCAB #5 (AP English)
2) Beatitude: (n) exalted happiness
3) Bete Noire: (n) a person or thing that one particularly dislikes or dreads
4) Bode: (v) to be an omen of
5) Dank: (adj) unpleasantly moist or humid; damp and, often, chilly
6) Ecumenical: (adj) general; universal: promoting Christian unity throughout the world
7) Fervid: (adj) heated in spirit, enthusiasm; intensely hot, burning
8) Fetid: (adj) having an offensive odor; stinking
9) Gargantuan: (adj) gigantic, enormous
10) Heyday: (n) the stage or period of greatest vigor, strength, success, etc.; prime
11) Incubus: (n) a nightmare
12) Infrastructure: (n) the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organisation
13) Inveigle:(v) to entice, lure, or ensnare by flattery or artful talk; to acquire by beguiling talk or methods
14) Kudos: (n) honor, glory, acclaim
15) Lagniappe: (n) tip, bonus, gratuity
16) Prolix: (adj) extended to great, unnecessary, or tedious length; long and wordy
17) Protege: (n) a person under the care of someone interested in his or her career or welfare.
18) Prototype: (n) the original or model on which something is based on for formed; someone who serves to illustrate the typical qualities of something.
19) Sycophant: (n) a self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite
20) Tautology: (n) needless repetition of an idea
21) Truckle: (v) to submit or yield obsequiously or tamely
DECLARATION OF LEARNING INDEPENDENCE (AP English & Expository Composition)
NO CHILD LEFT UNTABLETED (Expository Composition)
Thursday, September 12, 2013
LITERATURE ANALYSIS #1 (AP English)
1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read according to the elements of plot you've learned in past courses (exposition, inciting incident, etc.). Explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).
Exposition: in the first chapter, the reader knows what each soldier LITERALLY carries in their backpacks. The reader also learns that all of them carry the same things. After the first chapter, the author does not follow a chronological order of events, that's why the reader can say that the climax is not a specific one. I think that the purpose of this book was to show the reader that someone can not TRULY tell a war story because "what is story-real is not always happening-real."
2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.
Themes: instincts vs what is thought of right: when the narrator gets drafted, he does not want to go to the war but is also scared of what people are going to say if he DOESN'T go.
Truth: when O'Brien reveals that, the events are not real, he explains that in order for something to be real, they have to feel real. That's why he invented all the extra events that never truly happened.
3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
tone: melancholy/reflective. (1) “They carried their reputations. They carried the soldier’s greatest fear, which was the fear of blushing. Men killed, and died, because they were embarrassed not to. It was what had brought them to the war in the first place, nothing positive, no dreams of glory and dishonor, just to avoid the blush of dishonor.” (2) “He wished he could’ve explained some of this. How he had been braver than he ever thought possible, but how he had not been so brave as he wanted to be. The distinction was important.” (Page 153) (3) “Twenty years. A lot like yesterday, a lot like never. In a way, maybe, I’d gone under with Kiowa, and now after two decades I’d finally worked myself out. A hot afternoon, a bright August sun, and the war was over.” (Page 187)
4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)
1. symbolism:
2. foreshadow
3. symbolism
4. irony
5. diction
6 Juxtaposition
7. Imagery
8. allusions
9. flashback/flash-forward
10. narration
LIT ANALYSIS #1 (EXPOS)
TOPIC(S) and/or EVENT(S)
1. As we have discussed in class, a book is said to be nonfiction if its content is based on facts or events. What is your book about? [a]. Try writing a paragraph first to capture your thoughts. [b]. Then see if you can boil it down to one clear statement. (Even if you feel like you can just skip to [b], please do both; remember that your reader doesn’t know what you know.
A: The book is about some studies/surveys that have been done to a community of deaf people in the Washington area. B: analyze a deaf community
2. Why did your author choose to write about this topic, person or event?
he wants to understand a minority group better.
3. Why did you choose this book? What about the book appealed to you the first time it came to your attention (and how did it come to your attention)? What about the book made you want to keep reading once you began?
I choose this book because I am interested in becoming a translator and i'm interested in becoming fluent in ASL. I was in the library looking for nonfiction books and I decided to look up books regarding the deaf community.
4. Did you find the book realistic? Did you make any connections between people/events you read about and people/events in your own life? Why or (if you didn’t) why not?
Since the book talked about surveys done to deaf people, I found this book realistic. In reading this book, I was able to make connections between this book and the tv show "switched at birth" because this book talked about some issues that were present in the show as well.
PEOPLE
1. Since this book is nonfiction, the theory goes that the author didn’t create characters. But that’s not entirely true, is it? Doesn’t the author report his/her own interpretations based on personal observations? If we met his/her subjects for ourselves we might see them completely differently. What do the author’s choices say to you? Why did s/he choose to write about this book? What is the author’s tone, and what (if anything) does it say about the author and his/her subjects?
Since this book is mainly about surveys done to people who are deaf, the author did not create characters. However, the author choose what data to publish and how to publish it. In a way, the author could of manipulated the data to get people to sympathize towards the deaf community. The tone of the author is educational.
2. Describe two or three people from the book. What do they look like? How do they act? How would you write them as fictional characters (would you use direct or indirect characterization?
hmm. . .the book did analyze one specific person, but a whole community. It didn't give any names of people.
3. What about these people makes them interesting enough to write about?
I think that the author choose to write about the deaf community because there are people who still don't fully understand it.
STYLE
1. Did the author use any tools from fiction writing (such as foreshadowing or symbolism), or did the author use a journalistic style? Example(s)?
The author uses a journalistic style throughout the book.
2. Does the author use lengthy descriptions of places and people,or does s/he focus more on action or dialogue? What overall effect do these choices have on the book?
When the author introduces the book, he describes the different connotation of the word deaf and he explain which people who are "deaf" participated in the studies.
3. What tools does the author use to demonstrate tone and create a mood?
4. What do you think the author’s attitude was toward the subject, or the characters, or the audience (i.e., you)? Why?
I think that the author wants to educate readers about the deaf communities because he does not present his opinions but facts (studies result)
5. What resources (newspaper articles, interviews, historical documents, e.g.) does the author offer? Did it matter in your thinking? Why/why not?
The authoor presented result to studies and it made him more credible.
ENDURING MEMORY Write a paragraph in which you describe the one or two ideas from this book that you expect to remember for a long time. Explain your choices and their importance. Share a passage or two that give your reader a taste of the same effect.
An idea that will stay with me that i found in this book is that just because people are deaf, it does not mean that they will not be able to have a job, a career, or a family.