Monday, November 25, 2013

THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX (AP English)

Think about the place you have chosen as your hell. Does it look ordinary and bourgeois, like Sartre's drawing room, or is it equipped with literal instruments of torture like Dante's Inferno? Can the mind be in hell in a beautiful place? Is there a way to find peace in a hellish physical environment? Enter Sartre's space more fully and imagine how it would feel to live there endlessly, night and day:


My personal hell would be somewhere I can not be happy. No matter what I did, there would be no way that I could achieve happiness. My hell would be a place people are meant to be happy but I can not. I think that hell can be found even in the most beautiful place in the world. "Hell" is different for each one of us. If a person has a strong mentality, it is possible for them to endure a hellish physical environment. 

Could hell be described as too much of anything without a break? Are variety, moderation and balance instruments we use to keep us from boiling in any inferno of excess,' whether it be cheesecake or ravenous sex?

I think if you have too much of something, you will eventually stop wanting it and since you can not stop having it, it will become hell.

How does Sartre create a sense of place through dialogue? Can you imagine what it feels like to stay awake all the time with the lights on with no hope of leaving a specific place? How does GARCIN react to this hell? How could you twist your daily activities around so that everyday habits become hell? Is there a pattern of circumstances that reinforces the experience of hell?

Sartre creates a sense of place when the characters find that they are there to torture each other. I think that staying awake all the time with the lights on is kind of when you are trying to sleep but the lights are on or when the sun is hitting your face. Garcin is surprised by the room and feels like he needs to gain Inez' approval(?)

 compare how Plato and Sartre describe the limitations of our thinking and imply solutions to the problem.  Be sure to analyze their literary techniques, especially their use of allegory and extended metaphor.

Plato shows that a student is limited by the way they think. If a person wanted to be intellectually free, they could be. Sartre shows the limit to our thinking lays on the information we have and whether or not we accept it. 




Thursday, November 21, 2013

ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE SONNET (AP English)

intellectual freedom is never easy.
in a dark cave we life most of our lives.
not being able to see the real truth can be uneasy.
scholars say ignorance are like knifes.

Intellectual freedom is not common.
most people do not value mental freedom.
people missing the world is not uncommon.
ignorance can rule the world like a demon.

how can people terminate ignorance?
the decision must come from within to stop.
intelligence has a very strong fragrance.
intelligence always makes you the top.

a mind can never be kept inside a cave.
a person who gets out of the cave is brave.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

BRAIN WITH 6 LEGS

Marisol, Elisia and I decided to read Great Expectations by Charles Dickens. In order to collaborate regarding our reading, we plan on discussing our readings during class and creating a Facebook group message to continue discussing our book online. We also plan to meet up at one of our houses' during the break in order to clarify any confusion and discuss our understanding of the readings. We will start reading our book on November 21 and read about 37 pages each day. 


Friday, November 15, 2013

PLATO STUDY QUESTIONS (AP English)

1. According to Socrates, what does the Allegory of the Cave represent?
the concept of reality and knowledge
2. What are the key elements in the imagery used in the allegory?
prisoners= humans
shadows=appearances (what we think is right/real)
the outside: new ideas/knowledge
prisoner that escapes= teacher
3. What are some things the allegory suggests about the process of enlightenment or education?
it's a struggle and that if you have completely different views on something, people might be react in a negative way to you.
4. What do the imagery of "shackles" and the "cave" suggest about the perspective of the cave dwellers or prisoners?
the cave suggests that people are cut of from knowledge and the shackles are what's keeping them restrained.
5. In society today or in your own life, what sorts of things shackle the mind?
laziness and the fear of the unknown
6. Compare the perspective of the freed prisoner with the cave prisoners?
the freed prisoner is enlightened and the cave prisoners are reluctant to go outside because they are used to being in there
7. According to the allegory, lack of clarity or intellectual confusion can occur in two distinct ways or contexts. What are they?
when they are enclosed and can't know the truth or when they don't want to know
8. According to the allegory, how do cave prisoners get free? What does this suggest about intellectual freedom?
by going outside and learning the truth. Intellectual freedom is as essential as physical freedom
9. The allegory presupposes that there is a distinction between appearances and reality. Do you agree? Why or why not?
yes because what you may perceive as real might be something else.
10. If Socrates is incorrect in his assumption that there is a distinction between reality and appearances, what are the two alternative metaphysical assumptions?
that people just assume is real if they can see it even though it might not be true.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

CONNECTING THE DOTS (Expository)

Based on my thoughts from zero period, I am considering the topic "racism against minority groups who don't speak the regional language." I am thinking on focusing not only in the U.S but in other countries as well.

Monday, November 11, 2013

RESEARCH PAPER (Expository)


Xenophobia = Racism
In the United States, it is estimated that 58.5% of hate crimes are based on race or ethnicity (fbi.com).  The reason behind the “hate” that triggers these crimes can be say that is fear. “Scientists believe the discovery can be explained by the fact that implicit racism is fundamentally founded on fear, and the drug acts both on nerve circuits that govern automatic functions, such as heart rate, and the part of the brain involved in emotional responses.” (M. Rooks)

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

SONNET ANALYSIS #1

This are my notes on sonnets

A POETIC INQUIRY (AP ENGLISH)

big question: Why is world peace sooooo hard to obtain? I mean, if EVERYONE took in consideration other people and stopped being selfish, world peace would not be so hard to obtain!
Why can't ALL humans cooperate with each other and make the Earth a better planet to live in? without any violence, corruption, or misery? How can languge help reach world peace?

I have not changed my question. But now I am a bit more focused on the linguistics concept of it because I would like to be a translator.

Finding a sonnet was difficult. Were we supposed to choose a sonnet by Shakespeare or Petrarchan? or it didn't matter who the author was?

The sonnet that I found doesn't have a big relationship with the language component of my question but it does talk about peace.







Tuesday, November 5, 2013

7 TIMES (Expos)

1. tone? The tone in Erica's essay is one of disbelieve and personal while Javier's tone was neutral.
2. facts? Even though both of them said the same thing, I feel that Erica's facts were affected by her personal feelings and that might have a stronger impact on the audience. (Pathos)
3. conclusions? Erica comes to the conclusion that shooting a teenager 7 times is 7 times too many while Javier sees a way to justify the police's actions.
4. writing techniques (figurative language, punctuation/capitalization, etc.)? Erica uses the word "I" throughout the essay while Javier keeps a distance. This shows the use of syntax(?)  and punctuation. (?)
"bullet 1. and he was probably down or even dead
bullet 2. definitely dead
bullet 3. still dead
bullet 4. still dead
bullet 5. still dead
bullet 6. still dead
bullet 7. still dead

WHY 7?"

Personally, I can see why the police did what they did. If you take a minute to put yourself on their shoes, what else could they do?  They saw someone that had an appearance to be a gangster with a toy gun looked like a real one. However, I am not saying that the 14-year-old should of died. 

Monday, November 4, 2013

RACIAL PROFILING LIVES ON (EXPOS)


VOCABULARY 9 (EXPOS)

ultimate: being or happening at the end of a process; final.
The ultimate showdown happened when the smartest students had a debate against each other.

interactive: (of two people or things) influencing or having an effect on each other; to come into contact
Two year-old are very interactive when they play among each other.

principle: a fundamental source or basis of something.
A principle in physics is that an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted by an outside force.

guidance: advice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty, esp. as given by someone in authority.
I go to the career center to get guidance in my college applications and scholarships.

collaboration: the action of working with someone to produce or create something.
The doctors were collaborating in a case that was difficult to diagnose.

formative: serving to form something, esp. having a profound and lasting influence on a person's development.
In a pregnancy, the first 6-8 weeks are formative.

summative:  additive, cumulative
The grades for this semester are summative to my total GPA.

racism:  poor treatment of or violence against people because of their race; the belief that some races of people are better than others.
Even though people would like to think racism doesn't exist, it still does.

intelligence: the ability to learn or understand things or to deal with new or difficult situations
I wish I had Issac Newton's intelligence.

PERFORMATIVE UTTERANCE + HAMLET---ESSAY (AP ENGLISH)


     Throughout the play, Hamlet gives a few soliloquies that allow the reader know what Hamlet thinks and feels. Throughout the play, the impact of performative utterance on Hamlet and his sense of self was seen by his actions and the way he spoke to other characters. By using locutionary force, illocutionary force, and perlocutionary force through out the play, Shakespear shows how when Hamlet speaks, his words constitute actions in their self.
     The importance of performative utterance on Hamlet is shown when he says his soliloquies. For example, when Hamlet gives his first soliloquy during act 1 scene 2, the audience knows how he feels about his mother marring his uncle. In act 1 scene 5, Hamlet learns that his father was poisoned and he uses illocutionary force to order himself to kill hi uncle to avenge his father's death. By Hamlet commanding himself to "remember and obey" his father's ghost, he is condemning his uncle to his death. When Hamlet says that he will remember his father, his speech constitutes actions because that means that he will kill Claudius.
     Austin's idea is that languae describes and does. This idea can be backed up by Hamlet's actions. For example, when Hamlet gives his soliloquies, he is describing the way he feels and he is also describing how he is going to avenge his father's death. In other words, Hamlet uses his soliloquies to give himself a push in killing Claudious. By Hamlet "motivating" himself to kill his uncle, he shows that even though he doesn't know how to kill his uncle, he is sure that he needs to kill his uncle.
     In my opinion, "self overhearing" means that someone says their feelings, what and how they feel out loud in order to help them self make decisions or to clarify their ideas and feelings.  Another use of self overhearing is that it helps to memorize. When I was memorizing To Be Or Not To Be, I read the lines out loud and after a few repetitions, I had memorized that line.
     In conclusion,  Austin's idea of language can be seen through out the play by Hamlet's actions. In the play, self-overhearing has a big impact on the plot and the characters because by over hearing himself, Hamlet was able to decide what to do in order to take revenge against his uncle.
     



Thursday, October 31, 2013

vocab 9

aficionado: (noun) fan, enthusiast.
- My cousin, who often spends her time painting, is an aficionado of art.

browbeat: (verb) to intimidate by overbearing words or looks; bully.

commensurate: (adjective) having the same measure; of equal extent, proportionate; having a common measure.

diaphanous: (adjective) very sheer and light; almost completely transparent.
emolument: (noun) profit, salary, or fees from office or employment.

foray: (noun) a quick, sudden attack; a quick raid.

genre: (noun) a class or category of art, music or literature.

homily: (noun) a religious sermon or speech that is intended to provide spiritual education, or any moral lessons that are being imparted, especially when being imparted or taught in a tedious way.

immure: (verb) to enclose within walls; to seclude or confine; to imprison.

insouciant: (adjective) free from concern, worry, or anxiety; carefree; nonchalant.

matrix: (noun) an environment in which something is created.

obsequies: (noun) funeral rite or ceremony.

panache: (noun) a grand or flamboyant manner; style; flair.

persona: (noun) a person; the characters in a play or novel; a person's personality.

philippic: (noun) a cruel attack of words.

prurient: (adjective) having or expressing lustful ideas or desires.

sacrosanct: (adjective) extremely sacred or inviolable.

systematic: (adjective) having, showing, or involving a system, method, or plan.

tendentious: (adjective) Marked by a strong implicit point of view; having or showing a definite tendency, bias, or purpose.

vicissitude: (noun) a change or variation.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

TOOLS THAT CHANGE THE WAY WE THINK (AP English & Expos)

"Back in 2004, I asked [Google founders] Page and Brin what they saw as the future of Google search. 'It will be included in people's brains,' said Page. 'When you think about something and don't really know much about it, you will automatically get information.'

'That's true,' said Brin. 'Ultimately I view Google as a way to augment your brain with the knowledge of the world. Right now you go into your computer and type a phrase, but you can imagine that it could be easier in the future, that you can have just devices you talk into, or you can have computers that pay attention to what's going on around them and suggest useful information.'

'Somebody introduces themselves to you, and your watch goes to your web page,' said Page. 'Or if you met this person two years ago, this is what they said to you... Eventually you'll have the implant, where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the answer."

-From In the Plex by Steven Levy (p.67)

 How does use of the Internet, media, and/or technology change the way you think? Focus on your memory, your ability to concentrate, your sense of time and priorities, and the subjects/topics that interest you most. If you find "thinking about your thinking" difficult to assess, try the following strategies: compare yourself with older people who did most of their formal learning before smart phones and 2.0 existed; compare yourself with contemporaries who don't use those tools much today; read up on what education leaders and thinkers have to say about generational differences in thinking (and remember to cite your sources).

I think that the Internet has changed the way I think by enabling me to get information that I would probably never know. (even with filter bubbles) However, I think that in a way, it has made me less responsible and kind of unorganized. For example, if I have a homework assignment that I can use the Internet to help me with it, I would do that assignment last because I have Internet in my phone so I can do it during school. Also, I think that in a way I took a step forward and two steps back ever since I started to rely on the Internet so much.


FILTER BUBBLES (AP English & Expos)

a)What new information did you learn from the video?
-everyone sees something different when they search for the same thing and that the Internet doesn't really open doors for you, it just leads you to a place you will feel comfortable.
b)How does this information make you think differently about what you see online?
-there is more to what is being presented to me
c)What questions does this video raise about the Internet in general?
-how can I get all the different points of view that are out there?
d)How can you improve the effectiveness of your searches?
-by focusing on a different point of view

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

THOUGHTS ON HAMLET (IN PROGRESS) (AP English)

-I think that the reason why Gertrude can't see the ghost is because the ghost represents Hamlet conscience. But if that were true, how come the guards were able to see it? I'm still working in that.
-Dr. Preston said that he interpreted as the ghost only presenting himself to people who are pure(?)...that kind of makes sense because Gertrude has little/no morals.
-I think that since Hamlet didn't care that he killed Polonious, he is not going to care who he has to kill in order to get revenge.

The Performative Utterance in William Shakespeare's Hamlet (AP English)

performative: relating to or denoting an utterance by means of which the speaker performs a particular act.
utterance: spoken word, statement or vocal sound; the action of saying or expressing something aloud.

Hamet's struggle is in doing what his brain is telling him to do. And not in whether or not he should kill himself.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

WHAT I THINK WHEN I THINK OF ACT ||| (AP English)

SCENE |
-I think it's kind of funny that nobody knows why Hamlet is so upset...gee, I wonder why, it's not like anybody he loved was murdered by his uncle (Claudius) and his mom (Gertrude) get married as soon as she could. Oh wait! that's what's going on.
-I understand why Rosencrantz and Guildenstern would want to tell Hamlet's uncle and mom about his emotional state but couldn't they just say "Your mom and uncle are worried about you. What's going on?"
-Why does Claudius want to spy on Hamlet and Ophelia? creepy. There's a thing called privacy.
-When Hamlet says, "and thus conscience makes cowards of us all", is he talking about the way Claudius reacted?
-Hamlet was an a**hole telling Ophelia to go to a convent so she could give birth to sinner.
-Polonius is kind of annoying because he is dumb

SCENE ||
- I'm impressed with Hamlet's intelligence in creating a play that shows whats going on in his life.
-If I were Claudius I would get the hint that Hamlet knows the truth.
-Does Horatio know about Claudius killing Hamlet Sn? How does he know? What does he think?

SCENE |||
-Claudius is right in being worried about Hamlet's actions.
-Claudius is an evil step dad, he just sends Hamlet to England...
-Does Claudius love Gertrude?
-Hamlet shows his trust for revenge when he is willing to wait to kill his uncle

SCENE IV
-Gertrude is a bad mother in agreeing with Polonius (I think)
-what is wrong with Gertrude that she didn't react to Hamlet killing Polonius?
-Did Gertrude helped Claudius Kill Hamlet sn? Does she suspect anything?



Thursday, October 24, 2013

LITERATURE ANALYSIS #3 (AP English)

1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read according to the elements of plot you've learned in past courses (exposition, inciting incident, etc.).  Explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).
The protagonist of this book is Antonio Marez. The setting is Guadalupe, New Mexico. His father, Gabriel Marez, a "vaquero" (cowboy), would like to see his son grow up and follow in the same path that he did, but Antonio's mother, Maria Luna (a devout catholic and daughter of farmers), would like Antonio to become a priest. When Ultima, comes to stay with the family, she teaches Antonio about the earth around him and the basics of her craft.  After watching Tenorio shoot Ultima's owl, her spiritual guardian, Ultima herself begins to die. She asks Antonio to bury her owl, and he does so in honor of Ultima. In the end we see how Antonio looses his innocence and becomes a grown up.

2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.
A theme can be to be yourself and not let other people decide for you. (self-discovery?)

3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
The tone is one of comprehension.
 "I had been afraid of the awful presence of the river, which was the soul of the river, but through her (Ultima) I learned that my spirit shared in the spirit of all things"

"I could not lie. I knew he would find the lie in my eyes if I did. But maybe there were other gods? Why had the power God failed to cure my uncle?"

"The sun was good. The men of the llano were men of the sun. The men of the farms along the river were men of the moon. But we were all children of the white sun."

"There are so many dreams to be fulfilled, but Ultima says a mans destiny must unfold itself like a flower, with only the sun and the earth and water making it blossom, and no one else meddling in it."

4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)
Symbolism: Golden carp, Ultimas owl, Virgen de Guadalupe, the last name "Luna"
Diction: Anaya uses phrases and sayings that have spanaish words on it.
Direct Characterization: the way that Ultima is described
Indirect Characterization: the actions that Ultima does and the way people react to her.
Metaphor: the way Anaya says that the Lunas are people of the land and the Marez come from the sun.
Synesthesia: They way Antonio described the way the soil felt.
Aphorism: The way that Antonio's brothers acted when they come back from the earth.
motif: loss of innocence


Literature Analysis #3 (Expository)

A CHILD CALLED IT 
TOPIC(S) and/or EVENT(S)
1.     As we have discussed in class, a book is said to be nonfiction if its content is based on facts or events.  What is your book about?  [a]. Try writing a paragraph first to capture your thoughts.  

This book is about a boy who's mother abused him. In this book all the horrific things his mom did to David are exposed. 

[b]. Then see if you can boil it down to one clear statement.  (Even if you feel like you can just skip to [b], please do both; remember that your reader doesn’t know what you know.

This book is about the live of David Pelzer. In this book (the first of the trilogy), he relates the torment he lived up until he was 7/8 years of age.

2.     Why did your author choose to write about this topic, person or event?

To help people see the horrible things an abused kid went through. 

3.     Why did you choose this book?  What about the book appealed to you the first time it came to your attention (and how did it come to your attention)?  What about the book made you want to keep reading once you began?

I choose this book because I read the second book and I wanted to have all the details from the first book present while I read the second part. I decided to read this book because my friend recommended it to me. This book made me keep reading because I could imagine the suffering David was going through and it made me feel  sympathy.

4.     Did you find the book realistic?  Did you make any connections between people/events you read about and people/events in your own life?  Why or (if you didn’t) why not?

I found this book to be realistic because the sad truth is that many kids are abused. Fortunately, I could not relate any of the events and people in this book because that I know of, no one I know suffers from abuse. 

PEOPLE
1.     Since this book is nonfiction, the theory goes that the author didn’t create characters.  But that’s not entirely true, is it?  Doesn’t the author report his/her own interpretations based on personal observations?  If we met his/her subjects for ourselves we might see them completely differently.   What do the author’s choices say to you?  Why did s/he choose to write about this book?  What is the author’s tone, and what (if anything) does it say about the author and his/her subjects?

David presents the characters in this book the way he saw them when he was a child. If I were to meet the "Mother", I hope I could see her for what she truly is. An abuser. Since the story is told from a kid's point of view, it's understandable that David put some characters personalities different from what a grown up would see them. 

2.     Describe two or three people from the book.  What do they look like?  How do they act?  How would you write them as fictional characters (would you use direct or indirect characterization?

-Father: alcoholic and submissive to mother
-Mother: alcoholic, abusive, emotionally unstable, controlling 
I would make Father resemble a guy who has a nice face but looks like a homeless person. I would make Mother resemble an old women who has bushy hair. kind of like a witch.

3.     What about these people makes them interesting enough to write about?

Their ability to hurt an innocent child and not be tormented by it. 

1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization.  Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)? 

direct:
-when the author gives a physical description of how he looks like
-when the author tells the reader how his mom looked before she began to drink.
indirect:
-the way the author describes the "games" Mother played with him reveal that she was psychologically sick.
-the description of Father just looking away from David reveals that looking at David is something his dad can't deal with because he is not able to do anything to help David but he doesn't even try. 

2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character?  How?  Example(s)?

The author's diction goes from saying his dad is his hero to calling his mom "The Bitch" and calling his mother "momie" when she didn't abusive him to "Mother" whenever he talked about the "games" she played.
3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic?  Flat or round?  Explain.
dynamic and round. Throughout the book David is forced to grow up and anticipate his mom's next move so that he can be prepared.

4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character?  Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.

I feel like I know David and that I would like to follow up with his life at the present moment. 

STYLE
1.     Did the author use any tools from fiction writing (such as foreshadowing or symbolism), or did the author use a journalistic style? Example(s)?
I think he uses both tools, fiction and nonfiction like interviews at the end of the book and direct & indirect characterisation.

2.     Does the author use lengthy descriptions of places and people,or does s/he focus more on action or dialogue?  What overall effect do these choices have on the book?

He uses the descriptions of places to make an association of the way he felt. It's used to make a connection.

3.     What tools does the author use to demonstrate tone and create a mood?
he uses diction and syntax.

4.     What do you think the author’s attitude was toward the subject, or the characters, or the audience (i.e., you)?  Why?
I think he wants to create awareness of a problem through his memoir.

5.     What resources (newspaper articles, interviews, historical documents, e.g.) does the author offer?  Did it matter in your thinking?  Why/why not?

He uses dates and places I sort of know. I think this affects me because it makes it feel like is more realistic. 

ENDURING MEMORY
Write a paragraph in which you describe the one or two ideas from this book that you expect to remember for a long time.  Explain your choices and their importance.  Share a passage or two that give your reader a taste of the same effect..

Something I think I will remember for a long time is all the suffering that David went through and now he is a well-known author.

In your book, what do the key people learn?  How do they do it?  How do you know?

David learns how to cope with his pain and he does it by withdrawing within himself. I know this because he says that he didn't have friends and since he couldn't talk to anyone, one can assume he withdrew within himself. 

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Vocab 8


cursory- not thorough or detailed

impetus- force with which a body moves.

pinnacle- a high pointed piece of rock.

contumely- insulting language or treatment.

bereavement- mourning

cache- a collection of items of the same type stored in a hidden or inaccessible place.

consummation- the point at which something is complete.

calamity- a disaster

avarice- extreme greed for wealth or material gain.

fortify- strengthen with defensive works so as to protect it against attack.

erratic- irregular in pattern or movement

ubiquitous- seeming to be everywhere.

fortitude- courage in pain or adversity

nonchalant- appearing casually calm and relaxed.

affect- make a difference to

effect- a change that is a result or consequence of an action of other cause.
misappropriate- unfairly take for one's own use.

pragmatic- dealing with things in a realistic way that is based on practical considerations.

metacognition- awareness and understanding of one's own thought process.

devoutly- showing deep religious feeling or commitment

Friday, October 18, 2013

10/16-10/18

The first reading my group did was Hamlet's Soliloquy.  My part was to do activities 1-4 which start on pg. 5 of the value of life unit.

**Since we are on the value of life unit, I think this video is related to this.**


Tuesday, October 15, 2013

VALUE OF LEARNING/VALUE OF LIFE

This week I will be reading at least 2 articles in this class. One of the articles I want to read is the life calculator one. I am also going to do the activities for Hamlet because in the AP class, I am going to have to memorize it and I feel like the more I know about it, the easier memorizing it will be.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

GREEN EGGS AND HAMLET (AP English)

a) What do you know about Hamlet, the "Melancholy Dane"?

I know that the phrase "to be or not to be" comes from a soliloquy that Hamlet says. Also that he is struggling with his feelings after his father died and his mom married his uncle (his dad's brother).

b) What do you know about Shakespeare?

I Know that he is the author of Romeo and Juliet, he wrote tragic dramas, and that his works are hard to understand.

c) Why do so many students involuntarily frown when they hear the name "Shakespeare"?

Because Shakespeare has a bad reputation with students. When they hear his name, students connotate him with difficult to read plays that are boring. (is it just me?)

d) What can we do to make studying this play an amazing experience we'll never forget?

We can have disscusions to make sure we can understand the text and we can find the way to relate the play with our lifes.

LITERARY FICTION & EMPATHY (AP English)

."..after reading literary fiction, as opposed to popular fiction or serious nonfiction, people performed better on tests measuring empathy, social perception and emotional intelligence — skills that come in especially handy when you are trying to read someone’s body language or gauge what they might be thinking...The researchers say the reason is that literary fiction often leaves more to the imagination, encouraging readers to make inferences about characters and be sensitive to emotional nuance and complexity."

*This part of the article made me think about what I learned in my child developmental psychology. I learned that the female brain has a better connection between the two lopes, making them better at recognizing emotions. I think that since the number of women tested is unknown, there is a possibility that the reason that people were better at identifying emotions is because they were women.

*Since the expository class I'm taking focuses on nonfiction...should the curriculum be changed?

*When I read fiction or nonfiction, I feel sympathy towards the character regardless of the genre of the book.

*In the article it says, "Maybe popular fiction is a way of dealing more with one’s own self, maybe, with one’s own wants, desires, needs.” Does this mean that people who enjoy popular nonfiction are selfish and/or egocentric?

Thursday, October 3, 2013

LITERATURE ANALYSIS 2 (AP ENGLISH)

Title: LUNA Author: Julie Anne Peters

1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read according to the elements of plot you've learned in past courses (exposition, inciting incident, etc.).  Explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).

This book is about a transgender guy named Liam who calls him(her)self Luna. The exposition of the story
is portrayed as a series of flashbacks. The narrator of the story is Luna/Liam's sister. This book gives the reader an insight on the struggle that Liam and Regan go through in order for one another to discover who they really are.

2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.

A theme of this novel is acceptance. This theme is present through out the whole novel because Luna wants to be accepted by society and specially his(her) father.

3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).

A. Lucid (easily understood: "Her eyes found me and she smiled. An aura framed her, a glow."
B. wry: "Pretty. A word for girls. The way handsome described boys. Liam was right; people did use boy and language. They expected different behaviors. When kids acted out of role,' as Liam put it, they were labeled tomboys or Sissies. "
C. Didactic (inclined to teach): "This isn't a good-bye. It's hello. I think of it as a new beginning because that's what it is for me. A rebirth."

4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.) 

1. analogy: The butterfly in the cover is a metaphor between Liam and the "transition" he wants to experience.  "I want to be free. I want to transition."

2. Internal Conflict: "'no one will ever know the person I am inside. The true me. The girl, the women. All they see is this...this nothing.'....'Liam.' He let out a short laugh. 'Who's that? A caricature I've created. A puppet, a mime, a cartoon character. I'm this male macho version of a son that Dad has in his head.'"

3. External conflict: "Luna held her head high, waiting. Almost daring him to do it. seconds ticked away. Years. Then, slowly, Dad released his fist. My lungs collapsed. Luna reached for the door knob. 'Excuse me,' she said. Right in her ear, Dad said, 'If you walk out of that door, don't bother coming back.'"

4. Character vs self: "'Dad is my her. Doesn't he know that? I feel like I spend my whole life trying to prove it. "'

5. Foreshadowing: "'why did you dress at school?' I asked her. 'why did you have to do that?' She lowered her eyes. "You said it; I had to. I had to test myself. To see if I could go through with it. I needed to know that I had the self-confidence, the will to do it everyday."'

6. Flashback: "'Liam. Lia Marie. Please.' My eyes well with tears. Please."  His left hand reaches out and snags the football helmet beside him. He holds it up to me by the faceguard. Inside is a mound of pills. Blue, purple,orange, white. 'I can't do it," Liam says. 'I can't even do it. I can't do anything right. I'm wrong. All wrong."'

7. Point Of view: The point of view is by the sister of the main character. "You're such a freakshow.". ..'I Know,' she murmured in my ear. 'but you still love me, don't you?'. .. yeah, I loved her. I couldn't help it. She was my brother." (pg.3)

8. resolution: "I took a step back, then another. I turned around. I walked, walked faster. Ran. Toward the door. The Exit. The entrance. 'Good-bye, Liam'"

9. Dialogue: The whole book has dialogue..

10. symbolism: The butterfly in the cover symbolizes Luna's desire to be herself.


CHARACTERIZATION 
1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization.  Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)?
DIRECT:
1. "you are kind and generous, compassionate and caring." (Luna to Regan.)

2. "you are a strong and beutiful person."

INDIRECT:
1. " What would I do without you?" (Liam, Aly, and Elise to Regan.)

2. "I deliberately avoided taking classes taught by the teachers Liam had, since he was like their wunderkid.'


2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character?  How?  Example(s)?
Yes. When the author speaks about Liam, the tone is usually nostalgic because Liam in apathetic to the things that happened around him. When the author speaks about Luna, she uses words that portray confidence. 

3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic?  Flat or round?  Explain.
If Regan is the protagonist, she would be a dynamic and round character. Through out the book Regan understands more the struggle that Liam goes through. 

4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character?  Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.

After reading the book, I Feel like I know Luna as if I were here friend. I think it's because I have a friend who is a transgender and thinking of the struggles Luna went through, I can imagine what he went through. 

LITERATUE ANALYSIS 2 (Expository)

Title: THE LOST BOY Author: David Pelzer

TOPIC(S) and/or EVENT(S)
1.     As we have discussed in class, a book is said to be nonfiction if its content is based on facts or events.  What is your book about?  [a]. Try writing a paragraph first to capture your thoughts.  [b]. Then see if you can boil it down to one clear statement.  (Even if you feel like you can just skip to [b], please do both; remember that your reader doesn’t know what you know.

A. My thoughts on this book are that a mother should
ALWAYS love their kids. This book is about a a boy named David who is physically and psychologically abused by his mother.This is the second book, following"a child called it". In this book, the author talks about his struggles to find somewhere to call home.

B.
This book is mainly about a boy's journey through the foster care system.

2.     Why did your author choose to write about this topic, person or event?
I think that the author wrote this book because he wanted to rell his story.

3.     Why did you choose this book?  What about the book appealed to you the first time it came to your attention (and how did it come to your attention)?  What about the book made you want to keep reading once you began?
I choose this book because I read the first book and I wanted to read more about David's life.

4.     Did you find the book realistic?  Did you make any connections between people/events you read about and people/events in your own life?  Why or (if you didn’t) why not?
I do find this book realistic because child abuse is something that happends everyday. I am thankful that I can not relate to this book.

PEOPLE
1.     Since this book is nonfiction, the theory goes that the author didn’t create characters.  But that’s not entirely true, is it?  Doesn’t the author report his/her own interpretations based on personal observations?  If we met his/her subjects for ourselves we might see them completely differently.   What do the author’s choices say to you?  Why did s/he choose to write about this book?  What is the author’s tone, and what (if anything) does it say about the author and his/her subjects?
I think that I would feel the same way as I do about Davi's mother as I do now. The tone David uses is one of nostalgia.

2.     Describe two or three people from the book.  What do they look like?  How do they act?  How would you write them as fictional characters (would you use direct or indirect characterization?
If I were to write about Ms. Gold, Mother, and Father as fictional characters, I would use direct characterization.

3.     What about these people makes them interesting enough to write about?
Ms. Gold is interesting to write about because she was the one who let David out of his personal hell. I would write about Mother because I would like to know what was going through her head when he was hurting David. I would write about Father because I would like to know how he stayed with mother while he saw all the bad things she did to him.

 MORE ON CHARACTER/PEOPLE

1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization.  Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)?
When David describes his mon when he was smaller, he calls her Mother and when he remembers the "old" times, he calls her mommy.

2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character?  How?  Example(s)?
When David describes his mon when he was smaller, he calls her Mother and when he remembers the "old" times, he calls her mommy.

3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic?  Flat or round?  Explain.
The character is dynamic and round. He is dynamic because through the course of the book, he goes from 12 yrs to 18 years.

4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character?  Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.
I feel like I know David and that I would like to follow up with his life at the present moment.

STYLE
1.     Did the author use any tools from fiction writing (such as foreshadowing or symbolism), or did the author use a journalistic style? Example(s)?
I think he uses both tools, fiction and nonfiction like interviews at the end of the book and indirect characterisation.

2.     Does the author use lengthy descriptions of places and people,or does s/he focus more on action or dialogue?  What overall effect do these choices have on the book?


3.     What tools does the author use to demonstrate tone and create a mood?

4.     What do you think the author’s attitude was toward the subject, or the characters, or the audience (i.e., you)?  Why?

5.     What resources (newspaper articles, interviews, historical documents, e.g.) does the author offer?  Did it matter in your thinking?  Why/why not?

He uses dates and places I sort of know. I think this affects me because it makes it feel like is more realistic.

ENDURING MEMORY
Write a paragraph in which you describe the one or two ideas from this book that you expect to remember for a long time.  Explain your choices and their importance.  Share a passage or two that give your reader a taste of the same effect.

I think that once I have my house and my career, I am going to offer myself to foster kids in needs. I feel like it would be the human thing to do for the kids who are being abused.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

THE COMPARISON'S TALE (AP English)

explain how at least one of the tales you learned about from other groups shared Chaucer's choices of style/theme/tone with the tale your group read. 
I wasn't in class today so I have nothing to compare my tale to.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

TO BE OR NOT TO BE (Expository)

°I "translated" the soliloquy on a different piece of paper that I will be uploading later (tomorrow)

As I became familiar with the text, I realized that I understood the meaning in a different level. For example, I did not see the soliloquy as a way for Hamlet to tell everyone he wanted to kill himself until after Dr. Preston said it. The first time I read it I thought that Hamlet was undecided on nether or not to live his life the way he was. Later on, I found out that I wasn't totally wrong. For example, Hamlet had decided to kill his uncle but for some reason or another, he didn't.
The meaning I liked the most was the one that can be used as a way to go through metamorphosis in a physical and/or psychological way.

TALE OF A CANTERBURY TALE (AP English)

The Cook's Tale

Perkin Reveler was an apprentice from the same town as the cook. Perkin Reveler was a short, dark man, who sold food and loved to dance. He enjoyed the tavern more than the shop. Every time there was a procession in Cheapside, he would leave the shop immediately to go dance, and not return back to the shop. Perkin Reveler was also a thief, who often stole from his master. One day Perkin Reveler's master decided to let him go due to the fact that Perkin Reveler was a bad apprentice. However, Perkin Reveler was happy to have been let go because he was now free and was able to do as he wished. Reveler then met a companion who he had a lot in common with. His companion loved to dice, kept a wife for show, and had a shop.


1. Explain the central character of the tale by analyzing five (5) examples of indirect characterization. (Maria Luna)

1. "At every wedding he would sing and hop" This characterizes Perkin as a person who is loud and that liked to have fun.
2. "He loved the tavern better than the shop" This is saying that Reveler was lazy and he would rather party thab do his job.
3. "there was no apprentice in the town who better rattled dice and threw them down than Perkin Reveler" This shows that he was a gambler.
4. "his master easily had learnt this in the shop, for that is where he often found his box completely bare." This characterizes him as a thief.
5. "Who loved dice. to revel and disport." This characteristicwas used to describe Perkin's ally but since the cook said they were the same, on can imply  that Perkin was like this too.


2. What is Chaucer's purpose in telling this character's tale? Is he satirizing society, giving the voiceless a voice, or trying to accomplish a different goal? [Support your argument with textual evidence]
Chaucer's purpose in telling this tale is to ultimately show that people aren't always what they seem to be. I believe that Chaucer is trying to demonstrate the fact that one's character is based on their characteristics. The way one acts and presents themselves is who they really are as an individual. "He love to tavern better than the shop," indicates that Reveler did not enjoy working, but only liked to have fun.

I worked in the questions with MARISOL DUARTE

Saturday, September 28, 2013

TO ACT OR NOT TO ACT (Expository)

out of both assignments, I enjoyed reading the article better than the sililoquy. A difference is that the speech tells anecdotes and the sililoquy lets the readers know that Hamlet is feeling.

Friday, September 27, 2013

DEAR STEVE (Expository)

personally, I really liked the speech. When he talked about connecting the dots, I looked at my life so far and realized that I can't connect them...yet. I don't know if not being able to connect them is a bad thing or not, but I'm sure someday I will be able to. During the second story, I was reminded of the times I have moved schools and as a result loosing some friendships. The anecdote relating to death, I feel like I should life my life like that but I don't know what I would do differently. If today were my last day, I would still go to school, but not because I LOVE school, but because I don't know what else to do. . .

Thursday, September 26, 2013

CHARACTER STUDY (III) (AP English)

The first football game of the season was being held there and she was exited. When she was in school, she wasn't the type of girl who would go to the games. Before the game started, she went to the cafeteria and eat a taco that many students claimmed it was the best ones. When she was in the cafeteria, she heard some people heading there. When the unexpected guest entered, she was a bit angry to see that three guys that came in were from the opposite team. . .

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

THE VALUE OF CHOICE (Expository)

In this unit, I want to focus on the soliloquy because it is something that is alluded to very often. ("to be or not to be.") The way I want to learn it is not by reading it and taking a test on it but by having discussions and other interactive activities about it. By the end of the Unit, I would like to have my own opinion of the value of life in a well-structured way that can be backed up with facts and not only with "I'm entitled to my own opinion."

CHARACTER STUDY (II) (AP English)

All the way, Maria was trying to convince herself that this school had excelent teachers and that if she needed help in her first year as a teacher, her collegues were going to help her through it. The thing she was most exited to do was bond with her students. She wanted to be more than a teacher, she wanted to inspire and generate trust in her students.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

CANTERBURY TALES (I) (AP English)

 In a post to your blog entitled CANTERBURY TALES (I), list any observations about the Prologue.  These may include questions, vocabulary, predictions, literary techniques, and quotes/elements that you found especially effective or memorable.  *Which character's story do you most want to read?

*

CHARACTER STUDY (I) (AP English)

As I look around my room to double check I am taking everything I need.. When I reach for my door, I felt a thightening sensation in my through and chest. I don't know if its because I'm scared or because I'm excited that the moment I have been anticipated has come. As I close the door to my apartment, I tell myself that this school year is going to be amazing because I will get to meet new students.

NETVIBES (AP English & Expos)

hmm. . .at first, creating a netvibe was a bit confusing because I did not know what to put in each collum, now I sort of feel a bit better but I still need to play around with it so I can become a bit more confortable with it. I am having trouble adding my yahoo account to it but I have my gmail, so I gues it's ok. So far, I only have my email accounts, the AP and expos blogs, the weather, and the time.

Monday, September 23, 2013

VOCAB #6 (AP English)

accolade: an award or privilege granted as a special honor or as an acknowledgement of merit


acerbity: sharp and forthright style of speaking


attrition: action or process of gradually reducing the strength or effectiveness of something through sustain attack or pressure.


bromide: a trite and unoriginal idea or remark, typically intended to placate


chauvinist: a person displaying excessive or prejudiced loyalty or support for a particular cause, group , or gender.


chronic: persisting for a long time or constantly recurring.


expound: present and explain an idea or theory in detail


factionalism: relating or belonging to a faction (a small organized group within a larger one)


immaculate: a person who is perfectly clean, neat, and tidy. Perfect.


imprecation: a spoken curse


ineluctable:unable to be resisted or avoided


mercurial: person who is subject to sudden or unpredictable changes of mood or mind.


palliate: allay or moderate; disguise the seriousness  or gravity of an offense.


protocol: an official procedure or system of rules


resplendent: attractive and impressive though being richly colorful or sumptuous


stigmatize: described or t
Regard as worthy of disgrace or great disapproval


sub rosa: happening or done in secret


vainglory: inordinate pride in oneself or one's achievements; excessive vanity.


vestige: a trace of something that is disappearing or no longer exists


volition: the faculty or power of using one's will.

Obsequious: (adj) obedient; dutiful; fawning


2) Beatitude: (n) exalted happiness


3) Bete Noire: (n) a person or thing that one particularly dislikes or dreads


4) Bode: (v) to be an omen of


5) Dank: (adj) unpleasantly moist or humid; damp and, often, chilly


6) Ecumenical: (adj) general; universal: promoting Christian unity throughout the world


7) Fervid: (adj) heated in spirit, enthusiasm; intensely hot, burning


8) Fetid: (adj) having an offensive odor; stinking


9) Gargantuan: (adj) gigantic, enormous

10) Heyday: (n) the stage or period of greatest vigor, strength, success, etc.; prime


11) Incubus: (n) a nightmare


12) Infrastructure: (n) the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organisation

13) Inveigle:(v) to entice, lure, or ensnare by flattery or artful talk; to acquire by beguiling talk or methods


14) Kudos: (n) honor, glory, acclaim


15) Lagniappe: (n) tip, bonus, gratuity


16) Prolix: (adj) extended to great, unnecessary, or tedious length; long and wordy


17) Protege: (n) a person under the care of someone interested in his or her career or welfare.


18) Prototype: (n) the original or model on which something is based on for formed; someone who serves to illustrate the typical qualities of something.

19) Sycophant: (n) a self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite



20) Tautology: (n) needless repetition of an idea


21) Truckle: (v) to submit or yield obsequiously or tamely

VOCAB #6 (EXPOS)

accede: assent or agree to a demand, request, or treaty


 brandish: wave or flourish something as a threat or in anger or excitement


 comprise: an agreement or settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions


 deft: neatly skillful and quickly in one's movements


 destitute:without the basic necessities of life


 explicit: stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt


 extirpate: root out or destroy completely


 inopportune: occurring at an inconvenient moment or inappropriate time


 ironic: happening in the opposite way to what is expected and typically causing wry amusement because of this


 musty: having a stale, or damp smell


 officious: Assertive of authority in an annoyingly domineering way


 ominous: giving the impression that something bad or unpleasant is going to happen


 pinnacle: the most successful point; the culmination


 premeditated: think out or plan beforehand


 rampant: flourishing or spreading unchecked



 solace: comfort or consolation in a time of distress or sadness


 stately: having a dignified, unhurried, and grand manner


 supple: bending and moving easily and gracefully; flexible


 suppress: forcibly put an end to it


 venal: showing or motivated by susceptibility to bribery


Adroit: expert or noble in use of hands or body

Amicable: characterized by goodwill.

Averse: strong feeling of opposition.

Belligerent: warlike.

Benevolent: kindly feelings

Cursory: rapidly over something

Duplicity: deceitfulness in speech or conduct

Extol: to praise highly

Feasible: capable of being done

Grimace: facial expressions

Holocaust: complete devastation or destruction

Impervious: not permitting penetration

Impetus: a moving force

Jeopardy: hazard or risk to exposure to loss

Meticulous: showing extreme care about minute details

Nostalgia: wistful desire to return in thought

Quintessence: pure concentrated essence

Retrogress: go backward to earlier/worse conditions

Scrutinize: examine in detail

Tepid: moderately warm

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

WHAT A CHARACTER (AP English)

describe a fictional character that made an impression on you.  What was it about this character that made him/her memorable?  Can you distinguish/identify literary techniques that contributed to the overall effect?

A character that is memorable is Katniss Everdeen.  She is memorable to me because she is brave and has a strong bond with her sister, like the one ,my sister and I shared when I was younger. Direct characterization, indirect characterization and dialogue contribute to the overall effect.

FREEDOM OF CHOICE ( Expository writtig)

explain the pros and cons of being responsible for your own decision-making.  What opportunities does this present?  How can it make things easier, and how can it make them harder?  Ultimately, what do you prefer-- making choices or having them made for you?  Why?
Having someone make decisions for you might be sometimes be easier that making decisions for yourself. A pro of having someone else decide for you is that you don't have to stress over the outcome of the decision. For  example, even if you think that the decision is bad, there is nothing you can so so might as well just relax. A con is that if someone else decides for you, they might not make the best decision for you.  I personally like to make my choices. For example, if i make a bad decision, I know that it was MY mistake and i dont have the right to blame it on someone else. But if someone else decides for me and the decision is a bad one, I would get upset with the person even if they tried their best.

Monday, September 16, 2013

VOCAB #5 (Expository Composition)

Adroit: expert or noble in use of hands or body

Amicable: characterized by goodwill.

Averse: strong feeling of opposition.

Belligerent: warlike.

Benevolent: kindly feelings

Cursory: rapidly over something

Duplicity: deceitfulness in speech or conduct

Extol: to praise highly

Feasible: capable of being done

Grimace: facial expressions

Holocaust: complete devastation or destruction

Impervious: not permitting penetration

Impetus: a moving force

Jeopardy: hazard or risk to exposure to loss

Meticulous: showing extreme care about minute details

Nostalgia: wistful desire to return in thought

Quintessence: pure concentrated essence

Retrogress: go backward to earlier/worse conditions

Scrutinize: examine in detail

Tepid: moderately warm

VOCAB #5 (AP English)

1) Obsequious: (adj) obedient; dutiful; fawning


2) Beatitude: (n) exalted happiness


3) Bete Noire: (n) a person or thing that one particularly dislikes or dreads


4) Bode: (v) to be an omen of


5) Dank: (adj) unpleasantly moist or humid; damp and, often, chilly


6) Ecumenical: (adj) general; universal: promoting Christian unity throughout the world


7) Fervid: (adj) heated in spirit, enthusiasm; intensely hot, burning


8) Fetid: (adj) having an offensive odor; stinking


9) Gargantuan: (adj) gigantic, enormous

10) Heyday: (n) the stage or period of greatest vigor, strength, success, etc.; prime


11) Incubus: (n) a nightmare


12) Infrastructure: (n) the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organisation

13) Inveigle:(v) to entice, lure, or ensnare by flattery or artful talk; to acquire by beguiling talk or methods


14) Kudos: (n) honor, glory, acclaim


15) Lagniappe: (n) tip, bonus, gratuity 


16) Prolix: (adj) extended to great, unnecessary, or tedious length; long and wordy


17) Protege: (n) a person under the care of someone interested in his or her career or welfare.


18) Prototype: (n) the original or model on which something is based on for formed; someone who serves to illustrate the typical qualities of something.

19) Sycophant: (n) a self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite



20) Tautology: (n) needless repetition of an idea


21) Truckle: (v) to submit or yield obsequiously or tamely

DECLARATION OF LEARNING INDEPENDENCE (AP English & Expository Composition)

I sort of copied this entry from my August 27th journal topic. I changed some things but its kind of the same.

My big question is how can world peace be achieved by using language? And  Why can't ALL humans cooperate with each other and make the Earth a better planet to live in? without any violence, corruption, or misery? This year, my goal is to become fluent in ASL or began learning a bit of Korean or Arabic. In order to do that, I am planing on making at least 20 minutes per week to learn a new sign or word. 

NO CHILD LEFT UNTABLETED (Expository Composition)

I think that having technology in the class room is a good idea as long as the students and teachers know how to use it with a purpose. For example, this class is more technological-dependent that other classes but is not as much as other classes in college. In the article, I really liked this quote: "Entrepreneurs sound boldly unconventional when they talk about disrupting an industry, but they also sound as if they’re willing to break something in order to fix it — or just to profit from it." I think that that quote shows the sad reality of business today that don't care about the consumers but only about the numbers. 

Thursday, September 12, 2013

LITERATURE ANALYSIS #1 (AP English)

The book I read for this class is "The Things They Carried" by Tim O'Brien

1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read according to the elements of plot you've learned in past courses (exposition, inciting incident, etc.). Explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).
 Exposition: in the first chapter, the reader knows what each soldier LITERALLY carries in their backpacks. The reader also learns that all of them carry the same things. After the first chapter, the author does not follow a chronological order of events, that's why the reader can say that the climax is not a specific one. I think that the purpose of this book was to show the reader that someone can not TRULY tell a war story because "what is story-real is not always happening-real."

 2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.
Themes: instincts vs what is thought of right: when the narrator gets drafted, he does not want to go to the war but is also scared of what people are going to say if he DOESN'T go.
Truth: when O'Brien reveals that, the events are not real, he explains that in order for something to be real, they have to feel real. That's why he invented all the extra events that never truly happened.

 3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
tone: melancholy/reflective. (1) “They carried their reputations. They carried the soldier’s greatest fear, which was the fear of blushing. Men killed, and died, because they were embarrassed not to. It was what had brought them to the war in the first place, nothing positive, no dreams of glory and dishonor, just to avoid the blush of dishonor.” (2) “He wished he could’ve explained some of this. How he had been braver than he ever thought possible, but how he had not been so brave as he wanted to be. The distinction was important.” (Page 153)   (3) “Twenty years. A lot like yesterday, a lot like never. In a way, maybe, I’d gone under with Kiowa, and now after two decades I’d finally worked myself out. A hot afternoon, a bright August sun, and the war was over.” (Page 187)

 4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)
1. symbolism:
2. foreshadow
3. symbolism
4. irony
5. diction
6 Juxtaposition
7. Imagery
8. allusions
9. flashback/flash-forward
10. narration

LIT ANALYSIS #1 (EXPOS)

My book for this class is "The Deaf Community" by Jerome D. schein

TOPIC(S) and/or EVENT(S)
1. As we have discussed in class, a book is said to be nonfiction if its content is based on facts or events. What is your book about? [a]. Try writing a paragraph first to capture your thoughts. [b]. Then see if you can boil it down to one clear statement. (Even if you feel like you can just skip to [b], please do both; remember that your reader doesn’t know what you know.

A: The book is about some studies/surveys that have been done to a community of deaf people in the Washington area. B: analyze a deaf community

2. Why did your author choose to write about this topic, person or event?
he wants to understand a minority group better.

3. Why did you choose this book? What about the book appealed to you the first time it came to your attention (and how did it come to your attention)? What about the book made you want to keep reading once you began?

I choose this book because I am interested in becoming a translator and i'm interested in becoming fluent in ASL. I was in the library looking for nonfiction books and I decided to look up books regarding the deaf community.

4. Did you find the book realistic? Did you make any connections between people/events you read about and people/events in your own life? Why or (if you didn’t) why not?
Since the book talked about surveys done to deaf people, I found this book realistic. In reading this book, I was able to make connections between this book and the tv show "switched at birth" because this book talked about some issues that were present in the show as well.

PEOPLE
1. Since this book is nonfiction, the theory goes that the author didn’t create characters. But that’s not entirely true, is it? Doesn’t the author report his/her own interpretations based on personal observations? If we met his/her subjects for ourselves we might see them completely differently. What do the author’s choices say to you? Why did s/he choose to write about this book? What is the author’s tone, and what (if anything) does it say about the author and his/her subjects?

Since this book is mainly about surveys done to people who are deaf, the author did not create characters. However, the author choose what data to publish and how to publish it. In a way, the author could of manipulated the data to get people to sympathize towards the deaf community. The tone of the author is educational.

2. Describe two or three people from the book. What do they look like? How do they act? How would you write them as fictional characters (would you use direct or indirect characterization?

hmm. . .the book did analyze one specific person, but a whole community. It didn't give any names of people.

3. What about these people makes them interesting enough to write about?
I think that the author choose to write about the deaf community because there are people who still don't fully understand it.

 STYLE
1. Did the author use any tools from fiction writing (such as foreshadowing or symbolism), or did the author use a journalistic style? Example(s)?
The author uses a journalistic style throughout the book.

2. Does the author use lengthy descriptions of places and people,or does s/he focus more on action or dialogue? What overall effect do these choices have on the book?
When the author introduces the book, he describes the different connotation of the word deaf and he explain which people who are "deaf" participated in the studies.

 3. What tools does the author use to demonstrate tone and create a mood?

 4. What do you think the author’s attitude was toward the subject, or the characters, or the audience (i.e., you)? Why?

I think that the author wants to educate readers about the deaf communities because he does not present his opinions but facts (studies result)

5. What resources (newspaper articles, interviews, historical documents, e.g.) does the author offer? Did it matter in your thinking? Why/why not?
The authoor presented result to studies and it made him more credible.

 ENDURING MEMORY Write a paragraph in which you describe the one or two ideas from this book that you expect to remember for a long time. Explain your choices and their importance. Share a passage or two that give your reader a taste of the same effect.

An idea that will stay with me that i found in this book is that just because people are deaf, it does not mean that they will not be able to have a job, a career, or a family.